#Far cry 3 without uplay for free
#Far cry 3 without uplay Pc

While Ubisoft has been working to limit the damage, forum members (which we have not linked, for safety reasons) indicate that the hole in Ubisoft's games management tool has been open for a number of weeks, silently allowing users to download any number of the company's PC titles. Users have been able to download 'Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon,' which has yet to be releasedД¬opies of the game have been shared to Bittorrent tracking sites and video walkthroughs of the game have been uploaded to YouTube and other video-sharing websites.

#Far cry 3 without uplay for free

According to Gameranx, the software tool is able to fool Ubisoft's uPlay into recognizing a user is authorized to play games they do not already own, which has enabled some users to download copies of Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon for free and without DRM, even though the game is due for release on May 1st. I can see it being an irritant if you purchased through Steam, though (the Twitter discussion is a really nice touch - the 'game hub' section on Steam is pretty lacking).An exploit shared on a Russian gaming forum has allowed users to bypass protections on Ubisoft's uPlay games distribution platform, offering access to the company's complete line-up of PC titles, including those that are yet to be released.

Selecting the game opens up the full-screen artwork and the various option you can see in the pic. If you hit 'Games', initially it's just a blank background with thumbnails for each game. I'll post a screen-shot in a moment, if you want? It appears under a 'My Games' tab in Uplay. If I get it from Amazon, does the game always appear in U-play as part of my collection (a la Steam) after I've activated it in there or whatever, or is this game only launched out of there while downloaded on my system from amazon? I Still haven't decided what service I'm getting this game from. I don't really care how my game launches or from where just as long as I'm able to play it without jumping through an unreasonable amount of said: Uplay is alright, it's not impeding my ability to play any of the games and it's adding a nifty feature or two. Gamers seem really unwilling to let that one go even though Ubisoft has steadily improved the quality of their PC ports over the years to the point now where if I was giving out awards, they've be the recipient of 'Most Improved'. I think people are mostly referring to AC1 which was rather buggy, somewhat poorly optimized for PC hardware and had faulty DRM. Why do people say that their ports aren't great? I've played all Assasin's Creed games, Splinter Cell, Driver: SF and Rayman Origins and haven't had a problem with any of them.

Is this game so good on PC simply because consoles are so old, or is it something more to it? Could it be because of Uplay, and Ubisoft made this game like it's poster child? It's a game that launched day-and-date with the console versions, it's clearly superior to the console versions that I don't even know I wanna call it a port, and it only has the one time login.ДЄnd this got me thinking. But Ubisoft is known as a company that delays it's PC games, uses draconic DRM and their ports are not always that great (although better than people give them credit for).Д«ut with Far Cry 3, this seems to be completely different. I know that having more download services will just split our games across multiple accounts, and that in itself sucks.